skip to content »

tai-lend.ru

Dating friend fsm fun hang

dating friend fsm fun hang-13

They were wrong about ice ages in the 1970s, they are wrong now about global warming. Since, according to the fake-skeptics, there was so much news coverage of the imminent ice age why not just use a real 1970s cover?I searched around on Time’s website and looked through all of the covers from the 1970s. ) to find not a single cover with the promise of an in-depth, special report on the Coming Ice Age. Time’s competition, Newsweek, joined in with “The Cooling World” in 1975.

dating friend fsm fun hang-79dating friend fsm fun hang-71dating friend fsm fun hang-85

Why, in the Netherlands, a tulip can go for ten times more than the average worker earns in a year!What about this cover from December 1973 with Archie Bunker shivering in his chair entitled “The Big Freeze”? Maybe this cover from January 1977, again entitled “The Big Freeze”? How about this one from December 1979, “The Cooling of America”? Check out: Ubuntu and Linux Books ___________________ Now, there really were news articles in the 1970s about scientists predicting a coming ice age. People have collected lists and lists of “Coming Ice Age” stories from newspapers, magazines, books, tv shows, etc. But if it was such a big news story why did it never make the cover of America’s flagship news magazine like the faked image implies? In the 1970s there were a few developments in climate science: The realization that very long cycles in earth’s orbit could cause the waxing and waning of ice ages, coupled with the fact that our soot and aerosols were already causing cooling, led some scientists to conclude that we may be headed for another ice age. However, the warming effects of CO2 had been known for over a century, and new research in the 1970s was showing that CO2 warming would more than compensate for the cooling caused by aerosols, resulting in net warming.Check out: Books on programming, especially for kids ________________________________ This, in a very brief nutshell, was the state of climate science in the 1970s.A few years later, another Dutch trader comes to the little kingdom.Everyone asks if he is there to buy tulips, and he says no, the Netherlands’ tulip bubble has long since collapsed, and the price is down to a guilder or two.Seems newsworthy to me, maybe Time will run another cover story on it.

Imagine a little kingdom with a quaint custom: when a man likes a woman, he offers her a tulip; if she accepts, they are married shortly thereafter.

Suitors wishing to give a token of their love find themselves having to invest their entire life savings – with no guarantee that the woman will even say yes!

Soon, some of the poorest people are locked out of marriage and family-raising entirely. Marriage is, they say, a human right, and to see it forcibly denied the poor by foreign speculators is nothing less than an abomination.

The purpose of the image of the two Time magazine covers, and of the Coming Ice Age Myth, is not to show the real history of climate science, but to obscure that history and to cause confusion. Because today, when there really is a consensus about climate science and 97% of climatologists agree that adding CO2 to the atmosphere is leading to climate change, only 45% of the public know about that consensus.

The other 55% must think we’re still in the 1970s when scientists were still debating the issue.

The trader is pleased to find a new source of bulbs, and offers the people of the kingdom a few guilders per tulip, which they happily accept.